The difference between updream and a typical AI video website is immediately apparent when you first open it.
Instead of a large input box, you see a canvas with an Agent beside it.
I tried creating a short video in the style of a traditional Chinese xianxia fantasy and began by selecting the “Script Planning Assistant” Skill.
The Agent asked what the story should be about, what kind of personality the protagonist should have, and where the scene should take place. After several rounds of conversation, it produced an initial script outline.
The ending felt slightly rushed, so I asked it to rewrite that particular node.
After the revision, I continued to the next stage.
This sequence felt much more comfortable than rushing to generate shots immediately.
Once the script was finalized, the process moved to the storyboard. The Agent divided the story into eight shots, each with a visual description and emotional information.
Character reference images were also established in advance and reused in the subsequent shots.
Faces and clothing remained considerably more consistent than when generating every shot independently, although this should not be interpreted as perfect consistency.
The easiest mistakes occur in the early choices.
During one step, the system generated four images to establish the scene’s atmosphere. I continued without reviewing them carefully. As a result, several later shots inherited the darker color palette of one option, making the mood of the entire video suddenly much heavier.
I eventually had to return to the earlier node and adjust it.
This is where the Infinite Canvas becomes useful.
You can directly see which earlier node a later result inherited from, rather than staring at the final video and guessing where the problem began.
You therefore should not use updream by simply pressing “Next” repeatedly.
It is best to review the characters, scenes, and key storyboard frames. If the upstream direction is wrong, the Agent will only continue producing the wrong result more quickly.
The entire workflow took approximately 40 minutes.
Some shots still contained visible AI artifacts, but the continuity between the script, characters, and shots was considerably better than repeatedly moving assets between several independent tools.
What it mainly saves is the time required to organize the workflow, rather than automating the entire creative process.
Pros
- Skills let you reuse workflows that others have already validated: Beginners do not need to research the order of operations from scratch.
- Intermediate steps remain visible: Scripts, characters, scenes, and storyboards can all be edited separately.
- Well suited to narrative video: Short dramas and motion comics benefit from its emphasis on character and shot continuity.
- The Agent actively advances the workflow: You do not need to remember every production step yourself.
- Easy to revise upstream decisions: If the direction is wrong, you can return directly to a character or storyboard node.
- Advantageous for the Bilibili content ecosystem: It is particularly convenient for creators producing and publishing on Bilibili.
Cons
- Regeneration can consume credits quickly: This is especially noticeable with video and high-resolution output.
- Skill quality varies: A community workflow will not necessarily suit every project immediately.
- Human judgment remains necessary: It is not a fully automated, one-click video-production tool.
- More focused on narrative video: Abstract visuals and pure style experiments may not require such a complete workflow.
- Early mistakes propagate downstream: If scenes and characters are not reviewed, later shots will inherit the same problems.
- Pricing information may change: Membership and credit costs should be reconfirmed before purchasing.
Best for / Not ideal for
Best for
- Bilibili creators: Suitable for regularly producing narrative videos, motion comics, and short dramas.
- AI video beginners: Useful for people who can generate shots but do not know how to organize a complete project.
- Short-drama and motion-comic creators: Well suited to character locking, continuous storyboards, and batch generation.
- Film and advertising professionals: Quickly create storyboards, concept films, and visual previsualizations.
- People with established creative workflows: Frequently repeated steps can be packaged as Skills.
Not ideal for
- People who want a finished video from one sentence: updream requires user judgment during intermediate stages.
- People who only generate individual shots: The full workflow may feel unnecessarily heavy.
- People primarily creating abstract visual experiments: The advantages of its narrative Skills are less apparent.
- People unwilling to review intermediate results: One incorrect early decision may affect the entire video.
- Very occasional users: Once the free credits are gone, a membership or additional credits may not be worthwhile.
- People with strictly fixed budgets: The number of regenerations directly affects the final cost.
Comments (0)